Click on each question to expand and see each candidate's responses.
Kenneth Gantt:
During the week, I work in the northern Virginia area of Ballston/Marymount University, therefore I’m out early on the Virginia Railway Express (VRE) returning late in the evening, occasionally I take the FRED bus to the train station. On the weekends, when I tend to venture down and around town this generally by driving then walking. I would say that most of the time, my navigation of the city is by walking and sometimes by jogging. I only recently began biking again, so that will be a work in progress around the community, especially using the VCR trail, and Battlefield Historical area.
David Cropper:
As a long-time resident of Fredericksburg in Ward One, I get around most days by driving, as I am an active Realtor and spend a lot of time in the car; however, I do enjoy the VCR trail that runs from my neighborhood to downtown. I also enjoy the trail near my office during my lunch breaks near Old Mill Park.
M.D. "Matt" Rowe:
I mostly get around Fredericksburg by car. Living in Ward 1, on the western side of the city, means being in a community designed with a suburban character that is naturally more car oriented. When I visit other parts of the city, especially Downtown, I often park and then walk to enjoy the area. I have tried our transit system, but the current lead times where I live make it less practical for my daily needs. I believe we can explore new innovative ideas to make transit more appealing, even for residents who typically drive, so that it becomes a true alternative choice for more people.
Kenneth Gantt:
I advocate for a Complete Streets policy, ensuring infrastructure improvements accommodate all users—including pedestrians, motorists, cyclists, and individuals with mobility challenges. Priorities include expanding crosswalks, enhancing street lighting, implementing traffic-calming measures in residential neighborhoods, and investing in ADA-compliant sidewalks that provide connectivity throughout the city.
David Cropper:
This isn't an either/or issue—it’s about thoughtful planning. We can design streets that work for everyone, especially downtown. That means investing in better crosswalks and protected bike lanes, but we also need to recognize the needs of drivers, particularly for freight, emergency vehicles, and commuters. My approach is about integration: using proven strategies like complete streets design to ensure everyone—whether on foot, bike, or behind the wheel—can move safely and efficiently through our city. Let's look at cities such as Charlottesville, which has a walkable town. We can redirect some traffic away from Caroline Street, blocking it off from Wolfe Street to William Street, creating a pedestrian-only area, as well as al fresco dining. This could also allow the City to bring in more small businesses by allowing vendor carts.
M.D. "Matt" Rowe:
I believe we can preserve both pedestrian safety and reasonable vehicular access by using thoughtful street design. In some areas, road diets can be effective tools to slow traffic and create a safer environment for people walking or biking. At the same time, we should avoid the pitfalls of induced demand, where adding lanes only leads to more congestion. Safe crosswalks with flashing lights and reflective paint are essential for protecting pedestrians and encouraging walking. Balancing these priorities will help ensure our streets work for everyone no matter how they choose to get around.
Kenneth Gantt:
Should annual revenues exceed $50 million, I recommend strategic reinvestment in the following areas:
- Upgrades to public infrastructure, including stormwater systems, utilities, and roadways
- Support for education, public safety, and expanded broadband access
- Establishment of a Community Benefits Fund to allocate resources to parks, historic preservation, and neighborhood improvements, guided by public input and oversight
David Cropper:
This new revenue gives us an incredible opportunity—but only if we plan responsibly. First, I’d prioritize reinvestment in infrastructure: improving roads, utilities, and broadband to support both current residents and future growth. Second, we should earmark a portion of that revenue for affordable housing initiatives—making sure that the economic benefits of growth don’t push working families out. I’d also advocate for allocating funds toward public schools, environmental sustainability, and enhancing parks and public spaces. A balanced approach ensures this revenue supports long-term quality of life for all Fredericksburg residents.
M.D. "Matt" Rowe:
The tax revenue from the Technology Overlay District will fluctuate since the tax is on equipment rather than land. As equipment depreciates, revenue will decline, and as it is replaced, revenue will rise. We should first determine a generally reliable minimum annual return and dedicate that portion to consistent priorities like public education and public safety. The remaining and more variable revenue could then be used for targeted infrastructure improvements such as sidewalks, streets, transit, and utility upgrades, or even tax relief for residents in strong revenue years. This approach ensures stability while still delivering visible community benefits.
Kenneth Gantt:
It is essential that every resident has access to secure and affordable housing. My approach includes:
- Advocating for inclusionary zoning policies requiring affordable units in new developments
- Supporting city-sponsored housing programs funded through new tax revenues
- Expanding rental assistance, down-payment support, and safeguarding legacy homeowners against displacement
David Cropper:
We need a multi-pronged strategy. First, we can use a large part of the data center revenue to start a trust that will be used to assist those who serve Fredericksburg to live in the city through a rent voucher program and downpayment assistance when buying a home in the city limits. Second, we need to protect the affordability of existing housing through repair assistance programs and property tax relief for seniors and low-income residents. I’d also advocate for revisiting zoning regulations that restrict the development of smaller housing types, like duplexes or accessory dwelling units, in appropriate areas. This isn’t just a housing issue—it’s an economic and equity issue.
M.D. "Matt" Rowe:
Addressing the lack of affordable housing means expanding the range of choices available to residents. I support mixed-income developments located near transit and in walkable areas, which can lower transportation costs and strengthen neighborhood vitality. I also back efforts to add “missing middle” housing such as duplexes, townhomes, and small apartment or condo buildings that complement existing neighborhood character. These options promote walkability, improve affordability, and meet the needs of a changing population. While I am in favor of appropriate condo development in the city, we must work with the General Assembly to address the high cost of liability insurance that discourages builders from pursuing this type of development. Options like this can give younger residents a chance to build equity and stay rooted in Fredericksburg. A more diverse housing stock will help create a stronger and more inclusive city.
Kenneth Gantt:
I support thoughtful zoning reforms permitting mixed-use development, particularly in walkable areas. Integrating retail storefronts with residential units which encourages local business, alleviates traffic congestion, and maintains Fredericksburg’s small-town atmosphere while supporting responsible growth.
My goal is to ensure Fredericksburg's growth remains thoughtful, inclusive, and responsive to community needs. I am committed to representing your interests effectively and ensuring your voice is heard in City Hall.
David Cropper:
Mixed-use development is key to creating walkable, vibrant neighborhoods that reduce car dependency and support local businesses, particularly in areas like the Eagle Village Shopping Center and the Gateway Village Shopping Center. I would support targeted amendments to our zoning code to encourage more ground-floor retail alongside residential development. This can be done thoughtfully, with design standards that preserve neighborhood character and ensure adequate infrastructure. Encouraging a mix of uses is not just good urban planning—it’s good economics and sound environmental policy.
M.D. "Matt" Rowe:
Yes, I support amending zoning regulations to encourage mixed use development that blends residential spaces with retail and other services. This kind of planning creates neighborhoods where daily needs are within a short walk or bike ride and can reduce the reliance on cars while fostering a stronger sense of community. Thoughtfully designed mixed use areas can also attract local businesses, increase housing options, and make our streets more vibrant. The goal should be to move toward a true “15 minute city” model, where residents can conveniently live, work, and enjoy their city without long commutes.